Skip to content

Checking the NOAA OVATION feed

Aurora planning tools

Answer

Each tool answers one question with one method. Tonight's tools read the live NOAA feeds; the month and place tools compute darkness, moon and geomagnetic latitude for any coordinates.
16
tools, 6 read live NOAA data

Tonight

Live OVATION cells, tonight's darkness and NWS cloud.

Why there is no single aurora score

Some aurora apps multiply activity, cloud and darkness into one number. Glow does not, and the reason is practical. The inputs come from different sources, on different clocks, and fail in different ways. A single score hides which input is missing.

Take two nights. On the first, the OVATION cell over your town reads 40% and NWS forecasts 100% sky cover. On the second, the cell reads 0% under a clear, dark sky. A combined score could rate both nights as poor. Both are poor for you tonight, for opposite reasons, and they call for opposite plans: the first says drive to a clear patch, the second says wait for activity.

Scores also need weights, and weights need a source. No NOAA product says how many percent of cloud cancel how many percent of OVATION. Any weight Glow picked would be invented, and every page on this site follows one rule: a figure is computed from a named input with its timestamp, or quoted from an official source with a verified date.

So each tool shows its inputs side by side, as logbook rows, with the source and time beside each value. The chance tool is the closest thing to a summary: three rows for one location, read in order. Darkness first, because without it nothing else matters. Then the OVATION cell and its mode. Then cloud, where NWS covers it.

Missing data stays missing. When the NOAA feed is older than 2 hours, the live tools show nothing rather than an old oval. When NWS does not cover a point, the cloud row says so rather than borrowing another model.